Pages

Sunday, August 23, 2020

Do Jehovah's Witnesses "fulfill the prophecy" of Jesus to preach the Gospel "throughout the world"?

Matthew 24 is one of the most important chapters in the Bible for Jehovah's Witnesses since it deals with predicting the End Times (which JW theology is entirely based upon, see Here). Most of us have heard certain features of what Jesus said in this chapter, but JWs are unique in that they zoom in on certain details in order to emphasize that only they are the ones actually taking it seriously. The JWs are especially keen on what Jesus says in Mt 24:14, "This good news of the Kingdom will be preached in all the inhabited earth for a witness to all the nations, and then the end will come."

JWs think they are the only group that is preaching the Gospel everywhere, and thus that their global preaching ministry fulfills this prophecy that the end of the world will come any day now. To many who hear this it sounds convincing, because most Christians are not evangelizing at all, so the very fact only the JWs are evangelizing gives the JWs credibility that they are the true Biblical religion. So how do you counter this impressive JW claim? It turns out there's a powerful counter-argument that can pull the rug from under them, which we'll look at in this article. 

First, we should take a look at some official JW claims about Matthew 24:14, which can all easily be found on the official JW Online Library page:
  • Jesus pointed out another part of the sign when he foretold: “This good news of the Kingdom will be preached in all the inhabited earth for a witness to all the nations, and then the end will come.” (Matthew 24:14) While the world is experiencing terrible problems, over eight million people from all nations are declaring the good news of God’s Kingdom in 240 lands and in over 1,000 languages. This has never happened before in human history. (Watchtower, 2020, Public No.2)
  • Whether people agree with us or bitterly oppose us, few would deny that as a group Jehovah’s Witnesses are well-known for their preaching activities. As we know, Jesus foretold that the good news of the Kingdom would be preached in all the inhabited earth. (Matt. 24:14) But how do we know that the work we do is in fulfillment of Jesus’ prophecy? Is it presumptuous on our part to think that we are the ones who are doing this work? Many religious groups feel that they are preaching the Gospel, or good news. However, their efforts are often limited to personal testimonies, church services, or programs broadcast through the media​ ... What group of people are preaching that message in “all the nations”? The answer is obvious​—only Jehovah’s Witnesses. (Watchtower, May 2016)
  • But how would they [the 12 Apostles] preach “in all the inhabited earth” and give “a witness to all the nations”? Where would the workers come from? If only they could have looked into the future while sitting with Jesus that day! They would no doubt have been amazed to see the fulfillment of those few words that we now read at Matthew 24:14. We are living in the time of the fulfillment of Jesus’ prophecy. Millions have joined together to fill the earth with the preaching of the good news of the Kingdom. (Watchtower, April 2013)
This is but a few of dozens of passages expressing the same idea from official JW material throughout the decades. The sentiment is understandable and their argument is straightforward and apparently quite solid. So where should we turn? How about the Bible itself! Let's see what Paul had to say about this matter:
  • Colossians 1:6 Just as the good news is bearing fruit and increasing in all the world, so it is also doing among you from the day you heard

  • Colossians 1:23 the hope of that good news that you heard and that was preached in all creation under heaven. Of this good news I, Paul, became a minister.

  • 1 Timothy 3:16 He was made manifest in flesh, was declared righteous in spirit, was preached about among nations, was believed upon in the world, was received up in glory

  • Romans 10:17 So faith follows the thing heard. In turn, what is heard is through the word about Christ. 18 But I ask, They did not fail to hear, did they? Why, in fact, “into all the earth their sound went out, and to the ends of the inhabited earth their message.”

  • Acts 1:8 But you will receive power when the holy spirit comes upon you, and you will be witnesses of me in Jerusalem, in all Ju·deʹa and Sa·marʹi·a, and to the most distant part of the earth.

  • Romans 16:25 Now to Him who can make you firm according to the good news I declare and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the sacred secret that has been kept in silence for long-lasting times 26 but has now been made manifest and has been made known through the prophetic Scriptures among all the nations according to the command of the everlasting God

  • Romans 1:8 First of all, I give thanks to my God through Jesus Christ concerning all of you, because your faith is talked about throughout the whole world.
Most JWs are totally unaware of these passages, so it can be quite a shock when they see them since it would completely undermine their understanding of Matt 24:14. We can see from these texts that the Gospel had reached 'all the nations' and was preached 'throughout the world'. These texts don't necessarily mean the Gospel reached literally every individual and literally every square foot of the Earth, but they mean the Gospel had reached to the limits of the known world. This is not a controversial idea, as even the official JW publications admit this is what these verses mean, though they try not to speak of this when they discuss Matt 24:14 because of how it undermines their current understanding of it:
  • Watchtower, April 2001 says: Within 30 years after the outpouring of the holy spirit at Pentecost, Paul wrote that the good news had been “preached in all creation that is under heaven,” possibly referring to the then-known earth.​—Colossians 1:23.

  • Watchtower, March 2010 says: The Good News “Preached in All Creation” About 60-61 C.E., the apostle Paul wrote that the good news was “preached in all creation that is under heaven.” (Colossians 1:23) Did he mean that Christians had already preached in India, the Far East, Africa, Spain, Gaul, Britain, the Baltics, and Pytheas’ Thule? That seems unlikely, but we cannot be specific. It is beyond doubt, however, that the good news had spread extensively. Jews and proselytes who embraced Christianity at Pentecost 33 C.E., for example, carried their newfound faith at least as far as Parthia, Elam, Media, Mesopotamia, Arabia, Asia Minor, the parts of Libya toward Cyrene, and Rome​—encompassing the world known to Paul’s readers.​—Acts 2:5-11.

  • Watchtower, April 2020 sats: It was after that remarkable outpouring of God’s spirit in the first century that the preaching work began to go forward to the greatest extent. By the time the apostle Paul wrote his letter to the Colossians, about 61 C.E., he could describe the good news as being preached “in all creation under heaven.” (Col. 1:23) In Paul’s day, “all creation” meant the world as it was then known.

  • Insight on the Scriptures, Vol 2, p.673 says: Since all who became disciples also became preachers of the Word, the good news spread rapidly, and by the time Paul wrote his letter to the Colossians (c. 60-61 C.E. or about 27 years after Christ’s death), he could speak of the good news “which was preached in all creation that is under heaven.” (Col 1:23) Hence, Christ’s prophecy of the ‘preaching of the good news in all the nations’ saw a certain fulfillment prior to the destruction of Jerusalem and its temple in 70 C.E. (Mt 24:14; Mr 13:10; MAP, Vol. 2, p. 744) Jesus’ own words, as well as the book of Revelation, written after that destruction, point to a greater fulfillment of this prophecy at the time of Christ’s beginning to exercise Kingdom rule and preliminary to the destruction of all adversaries of that Kingdom, a logical time for a great heralding work to be accomplished.​—Re 12:7-12, 17; 14:6, 7; 19:5, 6; 22:17.

  • JW Study Bible, Note on Rom 10:18 into all the earth their sound went out: Paul here quotes from Ps 19:4, which describes how the silent witness given by God’s physical creation reaches the whole earth. Paul extends the application to the preaching work. He indicates that just as creation’s testimony reaches all the earth, to the point that rejection of God is inexcusable (Ro 1:20), so the extensive preaching of the “good news” (Ro 10:15) concerning Christ had given the Jews plenty of opportunities to accept it.

  • JW Study Bible, Note on Acts 1:8 to the most distant part of the earth: Or “to the ends (extremity) of the earth.” The same Greek expression is used at Ac 13:47 in a prophecy quoted from Isa 49:6, where the Greek Septuagint also uses the term. Jesus’ statement at Ac 1:8 may echo that prophecy, which foretold that Jehovah’s servant would be “a light of nations” so that salvation would reach “the ends of the earth.” This harmonizes with Jesus’ previous statement that his followers would perform “works greater” than his. (See study note on Joh 14:12.) The statement is also in line with Jesus’ description of the worldwide scope of the Christian preaching work.​—See study notes on Mt 24:14; 26:13;28:19.
Given this, we can certainly say that the claims made by Jesus in Matthew 24:14 were fulfilled in the first century, during the very lifetime of the Apostles. This also means that the "end will come" refers to the end of the Jewish system of things, the destruction of the Temple and Jerusalem in 70AD. Of course, this throws a wrench in the JW understanding of things, so they must do damage control and put a spin on it and argue that there is a 'second' and 'greater' fulfillment of Jesus' claims in Matthew 24. But this idea that there has to be a second greater fulfillment of things is an unwarranted stretch that cannot be allowed to slide. Even if we were to grant there is a future secondary greater fulfillment for some features of Matt 24, each of those would have to be clearly shown, not merely assumed. 
 
Again, most JWs are totally unaware of this, and think that 'preaching throughout the world' is only happening in our current time. By introducing them to to this far more Biblical claim of Colossians 1:23, you can plant seeds of doubt. As an apologist, your hidden (and longer term) goal will be to show the JWs that Matt 24 applies to the Destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD, and not some secret prophecy of our times that only they are fulfilling. Not only that, the JWs are not very deep thinkers, so they don't even realize that of their 7 million JW members, the possibility of preaching to each of the 8 billion people alive today is highly unlikely. Each JW would have to preach to at least 1,000 other people, but getting a hold of that many people is very hard. For example, assume a family of 4 is living in most houses or apartments, but when the JWs come either nobody answers the door or only one parent answers the door. That means that family never truly got a fair chance to hear the Gospel. On top of that, in some countries preaching is either highly illegal or very unpractical, so I doubt the JWs have given the people of India of China a fair chance to hear the Gospel. This is very different form the context of Matthew 24:14 though, where the goal was really for the Apostles to reach out to the Jews of the world to let them know the Messiah arrived and that the Jewish system would be going away soon. That goal 'simply' required going to all the major synagogues of the Roman Empire, which is why Acts repeatedly says Paul's custom was to go to the local synagogue of a city for a few weeks to let them know the Messiah arrived (Acts 17:1-2).

6 comments:

Talmid said...

Interesting post, Nick. The preterist view being true would pretty much falsify Jehovah Witnesses. I like this view a lot because it neatly explain how Jesus is not a failed prophet, some defended that He was by saying that Matthew 24 was about the end of the world, but i believe there are at least two ways that the witnesses could respond:

1. Matthew 24 is a continous text talking about the same future event, so if the theme is Jerusalem destruction, Christ should have come back after the temple was destroyed. This never happened, so the prophecy must be about the end times.

2. Paul and the other apostles seemed to believe that the world would end in their lifetime and did not talk about Jerusalem being destroyed, so it seems that Jesus words where suposed to be understood by a futurist view.

I think that you can respond to 2 by noticing that at least St. Paul and St. Peter, before their executions, did not believe that they would see the ressurrection( as we see on Second Timothy and Second Peter), that much of Revelations seems about Nero and that some church fathers did believe that at least some predictions where fufilled on the first century, so a middle preterist view is possible.

But i don't know how to answer 1. Jesus words on Matthew 24 seemed to connect the jews judgment with the Second Coming. How would you answer?

Nick said...

Agreed, either full or partial Preterism causes problems for the JW view. I think we are bound to believe that Jesus was predicting the destruction of Jerusalem in AD70, as this fits the Biblical evidence quite well and the ECFs affirm this was a prophecy of 70AD as well.

Jesus must have 'returned' in some form or manner at AD70, this just wasn't the very end of the world. However, I don't think the Second Coming of Matthew 25 needs to be seen as the same as Matthew 24. Or we could say there is a minor fulfillment at 70AD and major fulfillment at the very end. This doesn't help the JW at all because the most Matthew 24 can do is provide a 'general idea' of what to expect rather than pointing to specific verses of Ch24.

Whether or not the Apostles expected the end of the world is not clear. I read an article last year that showed Paul was not predicting the end of the world in his lifetime. I like your example that both Peter and Paul saw their death as immanent and weren't expecting to see the Resurrection.

Talmid said...

You could say that Jesus "return" on AD70 was as as a sort of judge to Israel, just like God did to it and other nations before, like you find on the Prophets. Israel destruction was Jesus official judgment of the jews, like the first destruction but this time being a complete rejection of they. Sure, the end of the Mosaic Covenant was on the cross, but the sentence was only done on AD70. I guess that something like that can work.

The troble is that i don't know if that is a good interpretation or Our Lord words on that chapter. The JW could just reject that interpretation, even if their own fails.

Nick said...

What specific words are the issue? Throughout the chapter there are verses that make far more sense for 70AD than the End of the World, such as Jesus talking directly to the Apostles with these warnings, references to fleeing Judea, not fleeing on the Sabbath Day, the temple being destroyed (v1-3), "this generation" will not pass away, etc

That said, a lot of the chapter is inconclusive one way or the other. For example, the "days of Noah" don't point decisively to 70AD or End of World, though you could argue that the story of Noah was a sort of 'system reset' the way destroying the Temple was.

The only verses that sound more like the end of the world than just 70AD are 24:30-31.

/////30 Then will appear in heaven the sign of the Son of Man, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. 31 And he will send out his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other./////

This verse could refer to 70AD, though it sounds more like the End, or it could be both. We might not appreciate just how cataclysmic 70AD was, and perhaps people did see Jesus return in some manner.

Talmid said...

Yea, the problem was this part, this i find harder to explain as refering to Jerusalem destruction. If you try to defend the preterist view, the JW could just pull this part up and say that it means that Jesus will come back after the prophecies made on this chapter are fulfilled, which will only happen on the future.

I agree that most of the text makes more sense on the preterist view, but this part is strange. Maybe you could see it as refering to Jesus apparition as Israel judge, but this sounds unreasonable if you do not already believe on partial Preterism.

Nick said...

Talmid,

I want to make a bigger post about this, but here are some things I found recently about Jesus speaking on "the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light, and the stars will fall from heaven, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds".

(1) The terminology of "sun, moon, stars" falling from heaven appears in the OT prophetic literature a few times, such as Isaiah 13:10 which says:

//1 The oracle concerning Babylon which Isaiah saw:
3 I myself have commanded my consecrated ones, and have summoned my mighty men to execute my anger. The sound of an uproar of kingdoms, of nations gathering together! The Lord of hosts is mustering a host for battle. The Lord and the weapons of his indignation, to destroy the whole land. 6 Wail, for the day of the Lord is near. Therefore all hands will be feeble, and every human heart will melt. 8 They will be in anguish like a woman in labor. 9 Behold, the day of the Lord comes, cruel, with wrath and fierce anger, to make the land a desolation and to destroy its sinners from it. 10 For the stars of the heavens and their constellations will not give their light; the sun will be dark at its rising, and the moon will not shed its light. 13 Therefore I will make the heavens tremble, and the earth will be shaken out of its place, at the wrath of the Lord of hosts in the day of his fierce anger.//

This prophetic language of the sun/moon/stars falling and going dark is referring to the End of an Empire. The mighty Empire of Babylon was about to fall, even though it was a world power and nobody thought it would fall after centuries. Imagine one day the USA suddenly being gone, which can/will happen some day. It would shake the whole world, figuratively but also real in a sense. But the falling of an empire does not mean the Very End of The World. But it does mean a major fixture is now gone, just as if the sun/moon/stars were one day just gone. Life would never be the same. When Jesus brings up all these images we see in Isaiah 13 above, in this case the focus is the End of Jerusalem. For 500 years the Temple and Jerusalem had stood, it was a fixture in the world. All Jewish life centered upon it, just as we use the Sun/Moon/Stars to guide our day/calendar. Jesus says the whole Jewish Life would be shaken to its core, as the "Day of of the Lord" comes in wrath.

(2) In places like Isaiah 19, we read:

//An oracle concerning Egypt. Behold, the Lord is riding on a swift cloud and comes to Egypt; and the idols of Egypt will tremble at his presence, and the heart of the Egyptians will melt within them. 2 And I will stir up Egyptians against Egyptians, and they will fight, each against another and each against his neighbor, city against city, kingdom against kingdom;//

Notice again similar language to Matthew 24. In this case, the prophecy is against the Egyptian Empire, where "The Lord is Coming in a Cloud" to judge them. This is figurative language for Judgment, with the nation covered with wrath like a storm cloud covering the helpless people below.

From both the "sun/moon/stars" (Isaiah 13:10) and "Lord coming in a cloud" (Isaiah 19:1) references, we can have good reason to read Matthew 24 as Jesus speaking of the end of Jerusalem, without having to read into it the Final Day of World History, as we have often done. Perhaps there is a secondary fulfillment, but the prophetic language shows this most certainly fits the Jerusalem situation without having to "read around" these verses.