Affirmative Answer to Question 1
Monday, March 30, 2009
Penal Substitution Debate – Answers to Questions from Negative
Penal Substitution Debate – Answers to Questions from Negative
Affirmative Answer to Question 1
Affirmative Answer to Question 1
Labels:
Debate,
Passive Obedience,
Penal Substitution
Saturday, March 14, 2009
Penal Substitution Debate – 5 Questions from Negative
Penal Substitution Debate – 5 Questions from Negative
-->
-->
QUESTION 1 FROM NEGATIVE
What Scripture teaches about Christ's sufferings directly impacts the validity of Penal Substitution, because if Christ didn't receive the proper type and degree of punishment which the elect deserved then the doctrine is unworkable and thus false. The following quotes from various respected Reformed sources describe the sufferings Jesus deserved and underwent:
Labels:
Debate,
Passive Obedience,
Penal Substitution
Penal Substitution Debate – Answers to 5 Questions from Affirmative
Penal Substitution Debate – Answers to Questions from Affirmative
-->
-->
Response from Negative to Question 1
The First Question begins by asking why I don't accept the various proofs put forward by you for penal substitution. I feel it necessary to quote part of the first question:
When I [Turretin Fan] present something that would support penal substitution you claim it’s not talking about God’s wrath being appeased, but something else. I see no consistent standard being applied from your side, so that I could see how to persuade you to accept that the atonement sacrifice (Christ) does turn away God’s wrath through suffering the punishment (death).
Labels:
Debate,
Passive Obedience,
Penal Substitution
Tuesday, March 3, 2009
Penal Substitution Debate – 5 Affirmative Questions to the Negative
Penal Substitution Debate – 5 Affirmative Questions to the Negative
Question 1 from Affirmative
In your opening statement, you described the penal substitution position as: “God's Wrath (due to sin) must be legally satisfied (i.e. sin cannot go unpunished) in order for sinful man to be forgiven and justified.”
Labels:
Debate,
Passive Obedience,
Penal Substitution
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)